Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Bombardier, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided November 16, 2005No. 4:04-cv-00040PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAND, District Judge.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 31) is presently pending before the Court. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
1. Plaintiffs Claims
This lawsuit arises from an accident involving Plaintiffs Sea-Doo personal watercraft: Plaintiff alleges that while he was attempting to charge the battery of the Sea-Doo, the Sea-Doo caught fire and burned him. Plaintiff, a resident of Alabama, brings various tort claims against Bombardier Inc., a Canadian corporation which manufactures Sea-Doo personal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sprietsma v. Mercury MarineSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bishop's Property & Investments, LLC v. Protective Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2009
- Phillips v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
- Heard v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Hornady Transportation, LLC v. FluellenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Jones v. Hawker Beechcraft Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014