Legal Opinion

Northwestern Consolidated Milling Co. v. Allebach

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1923No. Appeal, 262PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

There is some conflict in the decisions construing the fourth section of the Uniform Sales Act (Act of May 19, 1915, P. L. 543), as to whether a written cancellation of a verbal contract for the sale of goods may constitute a sufficient note or memorandum in writing of the 'contract to permit its enforcement by action. The weight of authority seems to be that the written unambiguous recognition of the contract and of its terms is sufficient even though it contains an express repudiation of the contract: Lawley Corp. v. Bupp, 230 Mass. 21,119 N. E. 186. But to have this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . Lewiston Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co. v. LampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. George Lawley & Son Corp. v. BuffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Lee v. Vaughan's Seed StoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  5. Porter v. PattersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Target Sportswear, Inc. v. Clearfield FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Leo P. Rich v. G.W. Pifer SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. McCrea v. Automatic Heat, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. N. V. Reinders' Olie en Veevoederfabrieken v. Imperial Products Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933
  5. New Prague Flouring Mill Co. v. HeenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API