Legal Opinion

New Prague Flouring Mill Co. v. Heen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1924No. Appeal, 3Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bv

Keller, J.,

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action of assumpsit entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The case must therefore be considered as if the averments of the affidavit were true; and the judgment can stand only if the facts thus averred, giving them their fair intendment, would, if proven on the trial, be insufficient to support a verdict for the defendant.

The claim is based on a written agreement for the purchase of flour signed by the defendant, Heen, and accepted in writing by the plaintiff, thus constituting a contract, which Heen refused to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northwestern Consolidated Milling Co. v. AllebachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Huber Manufacturing Co. v. SmithgallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Mayo v. KollerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API