Legal Opinion

Meeker v. Oramam Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On appeal by defendant from an order striking out its answer and directing judgment against it, and from the judgment entered thereon, in an action by the receiver of a national bank to enforce a stockholder’s individual liability, order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The Comptroller of the Currency had discretionary power to grant such time as he deemed proper for the payment of the assessment. (Kennedy v. Gibson, 75 U. S. [8 Wall.] 498, 505; Strasburger v. Schram, 93 F. [2d] 246; United States Nat, Bank of La Grande v. Pole, 2 F. Supp. 153,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cary v. . KoernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. United States Nat. Bank of La Grande v. PoleDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1932
  3. Meeker v. Oramam Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. PaysonNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bicknell v. HoodNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Haight v. First Trust & Deposit Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API