Legal Opinion
Haight v. First Trust & Deposit Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, District Judge.
This is an action to enforce a stockholder’s individual liability. The action was tried without a jury. At the close of Plaintiff’s case, and also at the close of the whole case, defendant moved to dismiss upon three grounds, the principal one being that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Decisions were reserved.
The bank did not open after closing on March 6, 1933, pursuant to the Presidential Proclamation. On March 29, 1933, a Conservator was appointed. On January 22, 1934, a Receiver, the predecessor of the present one, was appointed. On May 1, 1934,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Cary v. . KoernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Dumbadze v. LignanteNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Strasburger v. SchramCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Johnson v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Haight v. First Trust & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Haight v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942