Legal Opinion
United States Nat. Bank of La Grande v. Pole
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 27, 1932No. 9302PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEE, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity brought by the United States National Bank of La Grande to restrain the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States from placing Hugh A. Bodmer as receiver in charge of the assets of the plaintiff. To the bill of complaint, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
The complaint is as follows, omitting the formal portions:
“On the afternoon of Saturday, the 5th of March, 1932, United States National Bank Examiners C. C. Linden and M. C. Wilde, waited upon the Board of Directors of the plaintiff, which was then in session; and said bank examiners…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schrader v. Manufacturers' Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Liberty Nat. Bank of South Carolina v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Chase v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Moss v. WhitzelU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1901
- Washington Nat. Bank v. EckelsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adams v. NagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Barbour v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- In Re the Liquidation of Franklin National BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- O'Conner v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Meeker v. Oramam Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.