Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Clark
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1938No. 5978PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
The action is for malpractice and negligence. The defendants, physicians and surgeons, were employed to attend Vida Pearl Edwards, deceased wife and mother of plaintiffs.
Upon plaintiffs’ evidence the court directed a verdict against them. Hence their appeal.
The amended complaint upon which the trial was had, without quoting, alleged in substance that on September 2nd, 1935, Vida Pearl Edwards was about to be delivered of a child; that Stanley M. Clark, a clinical member with the other defendants, was called and undertook to wait upon her during confinement; (Dr. Clark was not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McKinnon v. PolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Snow v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Baxter v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- Reynolds v. StrubleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Moulton v. HuckleberryOregon Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dalley v. Utah Valley Regional Medical CenterUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Anderson v. NixonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Marsh v. PembertonUtah Supreme Court · 1959
- Richard R. Riley, Joseph Sanella and George R. Aiken v. Arla Joan Layton, an Infant, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Arnold L. Layton, and Arnold L. LaytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Smith v. BeardWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.