Marsh v. Pemberton
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Justice.
This is an action for malpractice and negligence. The defendant, a physician, performed an operation known as “triple arthrodesis” on plaintiff’s left foot and plaintiff alleges improper casting procedures and negligent post-operative care. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court dismissed the action with prejudice. From that ruling plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.
The evidence reveals that the plaintiff William Marsh, a married man 23 years of age, had injured his left foot and undergone surgery several years prior to his first consultation with defendant on May 17,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Anderson v. NixonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Fredrickson v. MAWUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Baxter v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- Baker v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Hundley v. MartinezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
- Butterfield v. OkuboUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Sáez v. Municipio de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.