Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Pemberton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1959No. 9041PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

This is an action for malpractice and negligence. The defendant, a physician, performed an operation known as “triple arthrodesis” on plaintiff’s left foot and plaintiff alleges improper casting procedures and negligent post-operative care. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court dismissed the action with prejudice. From that ruling plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The evidence reveals that the plaintiff William Marsh, a married man 23 years of age, had injured his left foot and undergone surgery several years prior to his first consultation with defendant on May 17,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Anderson v. NixonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fredrickson v. MAWUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Baxter v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Baker v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hundley v. MartinezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Butterfield v. OkuboUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sáez v. Municipio de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API