Teague v. Springfield Life Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
Defendant contends that those portions of the judgment entitling plaintiff to disability benefits from 22 October 1980 through 17 December 1980 and into the future are not supported by the jury verdict finding that plaintiff was disabled on or prior to 22 October 1980, and are conditional and therefore void. We disagree. Defendant relies heavily upon Green v. Casualty Co., 203 N.C. 767, 167 S.E. 38 (1932). In Green the contract of insurance provided for payments as long as plaintiff was alive and disabled. The jury found plaintiff to be disabled, and the trial court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Sumner v. . StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Sloan v. CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Green v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Town of Zebulon v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Royal MacCabees Life Insurance v. ChorenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Hawes v. VandorosNorth Carolina Business Court · 2013