Legal Opinion

G.M. v. M.M.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2015Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lawrence H. Ecker, J.

In this contested matrimonial action, a trial without jury was held over three days on November 13, 17, and 18, 2015. G.M. proceeded pro se and defendant, M.M., was represented by counsel. The parties, each duly sworn, testified at the trial. The only other witness was plaintiff’s friend, C.M., who testified that at one time plaintiff and defendant appeared to have a viable, intact marriage.

At the commencement of the trial, plaintiff presented sufficient proof, without opposition, that she is entitled to a divorce upon the grounds of irretrievable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Mahoney-Buntzman v. BuntzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Holterman v. HoltermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API