Ake v. Bookhammer
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
Solicitors for the parties have submitted their argument upon the demurrer on briefs. A reading of the *323briefs discloses a marked difference of view between the opposing sides as to the theory and nature of the case which the bill sets up.
The defendants view the complaint as one made against the eligibility of Hill as County Engineer because he does not possess the qualifications prescribed by the statute as necessary for one appointed by the Levy Court to that office, and the consequent illegality of the payment to him of the salary attached by the law to it. This being the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Greene v. . KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Lavin v. Board of Commissioners of Cook CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Tappan v. GrayNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
- Stadler v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Hagner v. HeybergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marshall v. HillSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- Spurlock v. LaffertyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Morrow v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- State ex rel. Schara v. HolmesMontana Supreme Court · 1956