Legal Opinion

Hallgren v. Campbell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1890PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Error to Menominee. (Grant, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

The plaintiff brought an action of replevin in his individual name against the defendant to recover possession of the following personal property, to wit:

“Two iron road-scrapers, one wooden road-scraper, one wooden beam-plow, one wooden tool-box and its contents, consisting of a quantity of shovels and picks, also all notice-books containing blank notices used by the street commissioner of Menominee city," — „

Which he claims belongs to the office of street commissioner of the city of Menominee.

The defendant defends upon the ground that he is himself street commissioner of the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Duncan N. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Board of Auditors v. BenoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Steckert v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. State ex rel. Denison v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  5. People ex rel. Mead v. Treasurer of Ingham CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Chamski v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. PraterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Townsend v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API