Legal Opinion

Weigle v. Brautigam

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 28, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Assumpsit, for goods sold. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lee County; the Hon. James Shaw, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

Weigle kept a meat shop in Dixon and Mrs. Brautigam kept a hotel there. She purchased meat at his shop for a series of years. Afterward he sued her in the Circuit Court for a balance claimed to be due upon her account. At the trial before a jury upon issues formed, the court refused to admit in evidence his books of account or any of the entries against defendant therein, and at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, directed the jury to find for the defendant. Such a verdict was rendered. A motion for a new trial was interposed by plaintiff and denied, and there was judgment against plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. House v. BeakIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McCord v. MansonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
  3. Mackin v. O'BrienAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  4. Peoria Grape Sugar Co. v. TurneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  5. Moran v. GordonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rude v. SeibertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  2. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. DickinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  3. Nitro Powder Co. v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. F. J. Dewes Brewery Co. v. KerwinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  5. Woolner Distilling Co. v. Peoria & Eastern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API