United States v. Haas
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
This is a petition for the return of seized property and the suppression of evidence.
During argument counsel for petitioner with the consent of the accused abandoned that .part of the motion dealing with the return of property and pressed only the part of the motion dealing with the suppression of evidence.
The motion is based on two legal principles:(1) That petitioner was arrested by postal inspectors without warrant authorizing arrest be made.(2) That subsequent to the arrest and through duress and coercion the postal inspectors required the petitioner to make available…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- In Re FriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Gatterdam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- A. Guckenheimer & Bros. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GockleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Simmons v. BomarDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1964
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.