Legal Opinion
M. Dean Kaufman, Inc. v. American Machine & Foundry Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 1, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
2Per curiam
We affirm essentially for the reasons given by the Appellate Division. 102 N. J. Super. 1 (App. Div. 1968). However, without proof that it is generally recognized in the finder’s business or profession that “in contracts of this type, absent specific contractual language to the contrary, there is an implied prerequisite of 'authority to offer’ which must exist between the candidate and the agent-broker” (102 N. J. Super. 9), we are not prepared to agree with that conclusion of the Appellate Division.
Affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteatjb and…
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kernan v. One Washington Park Urban Renewal AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Ass'n Group Life, Inc. v. Catholic War VeteransNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Coleman v. Dover CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
- KAZMER-STANDISH, ETC. v. Schoeffel InstrumentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Kernan v. One Washington Park Urban Renewal AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.