Legal Opinion

Kernan v. One Washington Park Urban Renewal Associates

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 12, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

154 N.J. 437 (1998)

713 A.2d 411

RITA KERNAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ONE WASHINGTON PARK URBAN RENEWAL ASSOCIATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,

v.

INTERNATIONAL SERVICE SYSTEM, INC., ABC CORPORATION 1-5, (SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS), AND JOHN DOES 1-10, (SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS), DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 18, 1998.

Decided June 12, 1998.

Jeffrey W. Mazzola, argued the cause for appellant (Staehle & Smith, attorneys).

Richard T. Garofalo, argued the cause for respondent (Garrity, Graham, Favetta & Flinn, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

Th…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API