Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Sioux City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 23, 1988No. 87-1644PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

Plaintiffs commenced these proceedings for inverse condemnation of their property on July 31, 1987, alleging the city had taken their property without compensation by passing a zoning ordinance restricting commercial development. 1 The city moved for summary judgment on the ground that the five-year statute of limitations codified at Iowa Code section 614.1(4) (1987) bars this action. Plaintiffs contended, however, that their claim is not subject to any statute of limitations, that their damages were not ascertainable until commercial development proposed for their property…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Iowa Coal Mining Co. v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Bob McKiness Excavating & Grading, Inc. v. Morton Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. K & W ELEC., INC. v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. Iowa Coal Mining Co. v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. Water Development Co. v. Board of Water WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API