Legal Opinion

Sundell v. Town of New London

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 12, 1979No. 79-059PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, C.J.

The issues involved in this case include whether riparian and littoral owners may recover in nuisance or in inverse condemnation for injury to their rights by pollution-caused algae blooms and whether the statute of limitations and prescription defenses should have been submitted to the jury. We uphold the trial court on all issues.

All but two plaintiffs are littoral owners of property on the shore of Kezar Lake; the other two are riparian owners along Lion Brook, a tributary of Kezar Lake. The defendant operates a sewage treatment plant which discharges nutrient-laden effluent into the brook…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brazos River Authority v. City of GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily NewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Duffield v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Birchwood Lakes Colony Club, Inc. v. Borough of Medford LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Burrows v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. Harris v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  5. Annicelli v. Town of South KingstownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API