Legal Opinion

Daniel A. Duran v. Maurice Cook, J. Peeler, and Jaylen M. Vendrell-West

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 10, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00526Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION DANIEL A. DURAN, § § Plaintiff, § v. § A-25-CV-00526-ADA § MAURICE COOK, J. PEELER, and § JAYLEN M. VENDRELL-WEST, § § Defendants. § ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff Daniel A. Duran’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint, his responses to the Court’s order for a more definite statement, and Defendants’ Jaylen M. Vendrell-West and Jacob Peeler’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 1, 9, 11, 22.) Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Upon review of the parties’ pleadings, the Court grants…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API