Succession of Pavelka
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to-Dismiss.
OVERTON, J.
Prank Pavelka, the husband of the deceased, Veronica Pavelka, is the appellant from a certain judgment rendered in this cause against him and in favor of Caroline Repak, the daughter of the deceased by a prior marriage. Caroline Repak, the appellee, has moved to dismiss the appeal. The motion for dismissal, in so far as it is necessary to quote it to show the grounds therefor, reads as follows:
“On motion of L. H. Gosserand, counsel for appellee, Mrs. Caroline Repak, and on suggesting to the court that on the face of the papers the appeal herein taken is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baker v. FrellsenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- Succession of DamicoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Pasley v. McConnellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
- State ex rel. Duffard v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- John Barkley & Co. v. Ham & SeymourSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Borden v. Louisiana State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Kendrick v. GarreneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Cochran v. Louisiana State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Typhoon Fan Co. v. PilsburySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Diecidue v. KilpatrickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.