Legal Opinion
Amrod v. Doran
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 8, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Seymour Schwartz, J.), entered April 3, 1984, which granted defendants’ motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ attorneys Whitman & Ransom from further representation of plaintiffs, is reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion is denied.
In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiffs seek to establish that each of them owns a 25% interest in the Lel Restaurant, Inc. (Lel). Defendant Eamonn Doran claims sole ownership of the restaurant and that the person from whom plaintiffs obtained their alleged interests owned no interest in the restaurant and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Saftler v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Emerald Green Homeowners' Ass'n v. AaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aerojet Properties, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Wyser-PratteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Kuberzig v. Advanced Dermatology, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Prodell v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Valloni v. CrisonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.