Legal Opinion

DeNardo v. Bax

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2006No. S-11487, S-11508PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Daniel DeNardo filed this lawsuit against his former coworker Joy Bax alleging defamation. DeNardo based his claim on comments made by Bax to coworkers that she was "worried that [DeNardo] was 'stalking' [her]." The superior court granted summary judgment to Bax on the grounds that her statements were privileged as statements of concern about personal safety in the workplace and that DeNardo had failed to provide *675evidence that Bax abused the privilege. De-Nardo appeals, conceding that Bax's comments were privileged but arguing that there were sufficient…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Jones v. JenningsAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Greene v. TinkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Pedersen v. BlytheAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hertz v. BeachAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API