Taylor v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
At issue is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant contends that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that Plaintiff fails to state a claim. The Court finds that, while subject matter jurisdiction is proper, Plaintiff fails to state a claim. Therefore, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
II. Background
Plaintiff Emma L. Taylor, an African-American, filed an IRS claim for refund of 1999 taxes on July 2, 2001. On her amended tax return, she claimed a refundable tax credit of $43,209, purportedly of undistributed long-term capital gains…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Colonel David W. Palmer, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. JosephbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Duffy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015