Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 14, 2003No. 02-1552 TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

At issue is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant contends that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that Plaintiff fails to state a claim. The Court finds that, while subject matter jurisdiction is proper, Plaintiff fails to state a claim. Therefore, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

II. Background

Plaintiff Emma L. Taylor, an African-American, filed an IRS claim for refund of 1999 taxes on July 2, 2001. On her amended tax return, she claimed a refundable tax credit of $43,209, purportedly of undistributed long-term capital gains…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Colonel David W. Palmer, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. JosephbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Duffy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API