Legal Opinion

United States v. Mitchell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided April 25, 1905No. 2,902PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELLINGER, District Judge.

The defendant pleads to the indictment that the grand jury returning the same was not regularly organized or impaneled, but was irregular and void, by reason of the fact that upon the impaneling of the jury on October 18,. 1904, it included W. E. Robertson and Carl Phelps, who were qualified and lawful jurors; that on October 19th Robertson was excused for the term by order of the court, without cause, and on: January 27th following Carl Phelps was, by order of the court,, excused, although he had been taking part in the investigation} of this charge; that one George…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Crowley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. United States v. ReedU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1852
  4. People v. JewettNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  5. United States v. CobbanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1904

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. American Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  2. United States v. WellsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1908
  3. Gridley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. United States v. SolomonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  5. United States v. RintelenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API