Legal Opinion
United States v. Wells
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided March 12, 1908No. 448PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITSON, District Judge.
There are several cases against a part of the defendants, indicted under section 5440, Rev. St. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3676) but we are only now concerned with No. 448, the indictment having been returned by the grand jury on April: 12, 1907. The defendants John I. Wells and Patrick Downs filed motions to quash, which were overruled in September for reasons-then assigned. They also presented two pleas in abatement. The first related to the statute of limitations. It was agreed by counsel in open court that this question was properly raised by demurrer theretofore…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Herman ChanenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Averhart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Raymond Patriarca v. United States of America, Ronald J. Cassesso v. United States of America, Henry Tameleo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- United States v. MandelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.