Legal Opinion

Holley v. Anness

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 25, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Before Fraser, J., Aiken, April, 1893. Action commenced June 2, 1892, by vendor against vendee for specific performance.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McGowan.

This is an action brought by plaintiff against defendant to enforce the specific performance of a contract, to purchase a small parcel of land described in the complaint, which reads as follows:

“Agreement. — This memorandum of agreement made this 12th day of March, 1892, by and between M. T. Holley, jr., and Charles Anness, both of the County of Aiken and State aforesaid, witnesseth: That Holley agrees, if he can get it released from the lien of a mortgage on it now held by E. H. *350Coster, to convey to said Anness, his heirs or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King and Others v. Hamilton and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Hodge v. SheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  3. Dicks v. CasselsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  4. Welling v. CroslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Midland Timber Co. v. PrettymanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API