Legal Opinion

Midland Timber Co. v. Prettyman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1912No. 8341PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Shipp, J., Berkeley, March term, 1912. Action by Midland Timber Company against J. F. Pretty-man & Sons. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from a decree of his Honor, Judge Shipp, The cause before him was a controversy submitted without action and heard by him on an agreed state of facts, entered into between the appellants and respondents. The controversy involved the construction of a deed for timber on certain lands and the right of way for a railroad over and through the lands. On January 24, 1902, Emma A. Heape made and delivered to’ the Atlantic Coast Lumber Company the deed in question, which was duly recorded on February 22, 1902, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holley v. AnnessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  2. Marthinson v. McCutchenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crews v. BeattieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Colleton Mercantile & Mfg. Co. v. Savannah River Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  3. Crown Orchard Co. v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
  4. Slatton v. SlattonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. United Timber Co. v. BivensDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API