Potter v. Hunt
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to review the judgment of the circuit court of Eaton county, denying a motion to vacate a satisfaction of a judgment, etc. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
The above-named -plaintiff, in 1879, commenced two suits against the above-named defendants before Justice DeGraff in the county of Eaton. The claim of the plaintiff in each case was upon a promissory note made by the defendants.
No defense was made in either case before the justice, and on the thirty-first day of March, 1879, judgment was rendered by the justice, — in one case for $800 damages, 'and $8.63 costs, and in the other for $285.37 damages, and $5.73 costs, *243—in favor of the plaintiff. An appeal was taken in each case to the circuit court for the county of Eaton, by the1 defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Wells v. ElsamMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Kinney v. TaborMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weeks v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Clark v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Fox v. State ex rel. PowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Line v. McCallMichigan Supreme Court · 1901