Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1934No. Appeal, 306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiff filed her bill for an injunction against the defendant, averring that she was the owner of certain lands and flowage rights on Pequea Creek, in Lancaster County, by a deed from Cora M. Bixler, that since the year 1911 defendant had repeatedly flooded these lands by the use of flashboards on a dam maintained by it across the Susquehanna River, of which the creek is a tributary, and that it had threatened to do so again, and would do so unless restrained by the court. Defendant, in its answer, denied that plaintiff was the owner of said lands and flowage…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Piro v. ShipleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Bowser v. Citizens Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Dunsmore, Receiver v. Franklin F. I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Bitting's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Werdebach's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hesselman v. Somerset Community HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Lackawanna Ice Co. v. WeingartnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API