Legal Opinion

Lackawanna Ice Co. v. Weingartner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1937No. Appeal, 306PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Plaintiffs, who are lessor and lessee, filed their bill against defendants, now appellants, averring that defendants had pulled down a fence which the plaintiffs had constructed on their own land. They averred the title under which they hold and that their land includes almost all of Lake Poponoming. They also set forth the title by which the defendants hold and say of it that the tract so conveyed to defendants “includes the small portion of Lake Poponoming not owned by” the plaintiffs. They averred that defendants’ purpose in pulling down the fence was to afford…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rhea v. ForsythSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  2. North Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  3. Grubb's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Tillmes v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Duncan v. H. & G. Iron Works, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Overly v. HixsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Klavon v. TindallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Hall v. Moon Valley Park, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API