Legal Opinion

Dunsmore, Receiver v. Franklin F. I. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1929No. Appeal, 162PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff, as receiver of the Hastings Coal & Coke Company, hereinafter called company, brought suit on a fire insurance policy issued by defendant to him, insuring him, as receiver, in the sum of $6,000 against loss by the burning of the contents of a certain power house building, in which the personal property was after-wards wholly destroyed by a fire of unknown origin. The personalty had been in possession of plaintiff from the date of his appointment as receiver until the time of the fire, but defendant showed that the company, prior to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Imperial F. Ins. v. DunhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Livingstone v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Whalen v. Smith Fireproof Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Lukens v. Wharton Avenue Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Elliott v. Ashland Mut. F. Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. AlberstadtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Schline v. KineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. First National Bank v. Monarch Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Commonwealth Piccerelli v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API