Legal Opinion

Warner v. Warner

California Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1950No. L. A. 20913Published

1Opinion of the Court

34 Cal.2d 838 (1950)

ANITA LIPTON WARNER, Respondent,

v.

THOMAS WILLIAM WARNER, JR., Appellant.

L. A. No. 20913.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

March 3, 1950

Manuel Ruiz, Jr., Fink, Rolston, Levinthal & Kent and Nelson Rosen for Appellant.

Gold & Needleman, J. George Gold, James J. Needleman, Pacht, Warne, Ross & Bernhard, Isaac Pacht and Bernard Reich for Respondent.

TRAYNOR, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for separate maintenance. After a hearing on an order to show cause, the trial court ordered defendant to pay plaintiff $500 per month temporary alimony, to give her the occupancy of the 22-…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API