Legal Opinion

Schissel v. Dickson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1891No. 14,758PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

McBride, J. —

This was a suit for the partition of land. There was a trial by the court, a special finding of facts, and conclusions of law stated thereon.

The case comes to us on exceptions to the conclusions of law. The facts, as found by the court, are substantially as follows:

In the fall of 1868 one Mary J. Hilton died intestate in the city of Indianapolis, seized in fee simple of certain real estate in that city — the property in controversy herein. She left surviving her as her sole heirs, her husband, "William W. Hilton, and an infant daughter, Cora B. Hilton, who was *141born July 12th,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pickering v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Milligan v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Essig v. LowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Kleyla v. HaskettIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ryason v. DuntenIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Thompson v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Geisendorff v. CobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Clark v. HillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Reed v. KalesbeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API