Legal Opinion
Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. Bayles
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 9, 1963No. 6 Div. 794PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $24,500 in a Federal Employers’ Liability Act case. This is the second appeal in this cause.
On first appeal, there was judgment for defendant but we held that the trial court erred in sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to Count B of the amended complaint. Bayles v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 272 Ala. 188, 129 So.2d 679.
The trial was again had on Counts A and B as before. Count A charged that the plaintiff was caused to fall or be snatched or jerked from a moving railroad car due to the negligence of officers,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Florence M. Nuttall, of the Estate of Clarence O. Nuttal, Deceased v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Smith v. LawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Walter Dunn v. Conemaugh & Black Lick RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sabb v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- State v. CutnoseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. CutnoseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Strickland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965