Sabb v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Per curiam
*21In this action governed by the terms of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., the sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in sustaining defendant’s motion to strike, made after plaintiffs case-in-chief, on the ground that plaintiff had produced no evidence that defendant was negligent.
Under familiar principles applicable where a trial court has granted a motion to strike the plaintiffs evidence, we state the evidence in a manner most favorable to the plaintiff. At the time he was allegedly injured, David Sabb, the plaintiff, was employed as a laborer by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shenker v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Donald D. Fletcher v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. ChittumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994