Legal Opinion

St. Louis, I. M. S. R. Co. v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 29, 1919No. 6271PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Nowata County; Wm. F. Gilluly, Judge. Action by Charles Patterson against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

This case presents error from the county court of Nowata county, and involves the question of the plaintiff’s right to maintain an action to recover damages on account of the alleged negligent acts of the carrier in the transportation and delivery of an interstate shipment of horses and mules. The action was commenced by Charles Patterson, hereinafter styled plaintiff, against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company, hereinafter styled defendant, to recover under the terms of a certain written contract or bill of lading, whereby defendant, in consideration of the sum of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Gleason v. Bamberg E. & W. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API