Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gleason v. Bamberg E. & W. Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 12, 1923No. 11184Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : Action for damages resulting from the breach of a.contract of carriage, evidenced by a bill of lading covering six bales of cotton, alleged to have been delivered by one S. W. Copeland at Ehrhardt, S. C., for transportation and delivery to the plaintiff, John W. Gleason, doing business in Savannah, Georgia, under the style of John W. Gleason Cotton Company, on October 11, 1919.

The plaintiff alleges in the simplest form conceivable' that on October 11, 1919, at Ehrhardt, South Carolina, S. W. Copeland delivered to the defendant six bales of cotton; that the defendant received…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API