Legal Opinion

Harbour Landing-Dolfann, Ltd. v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1996No. G014850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

In this case, we hold the trial court has jurisdiction to award attorney fees authorized by contract to the prevailing party on appeal as part of its costs on appeal after remittitur has issued, despite the absence of specific direction to do so from the appellate court. We reverse a trial court order denying Stanley and Mary Anderson their posttrial appellate attorney fees and costs against Harbour Landing-Dolfann, Ltd. (Harbour Landing) after they successfully defended Harbour Landing’s appeal of a judgment in favor of the Andersons in a lease dispute. We remand to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Morcos v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bankes v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler-Rupp v. LourdeauxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Barez v. Ni CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Darby v. Sisyphian, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Lonky v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Walters v. Moore CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API