Legal Opinion
State v. Pieger
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 6, 1996No. 13747PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendant, Marc A. Pieger, after a trial to the court, appeals from his conviction of evading responsibility in violation of General Statutes § 14-224 (a).1 The defendant claims that the court improperly *462(1) denied his motion for judgment of acquittal, (2) found him guilty of evading responsibility, (3) denied his second motion for articulation and (4) directed him to make a “charity donation.”
The trial court found that on March 29, 1992, at approximately 9 p.m., the defendant was the owner and operator of a motor vehicle that struck and seriously injured Tammy Sheldon as she crossed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Harris v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. PiegerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Haggerty v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. MilnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. MoralesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.