Legal Opinion
United States v. Articles of Drug
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 1987No. 86-1238PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the government in a forfeiture action1 brought against certain quantities of toothpaste manufactured and distributed by the defendants, Block Drug Company, and Leonard and James Block (collectively referred to as Block). The government alleged that the toothpastes were “new drugs,” and that, because no approved new drug application (NDA) regarding these articles was on file with the Food & Drug Administration (FDA), they were subject to forfeiture. The district court determined that no genuine issue of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linhart v. GlatfelterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. An Article of Drug Consisting of 4,680 Pails, More or Less, Each Pail Containing 60 Packets, Etc., Pfizer, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- The United States of America v. An Article of Drug . . . "Entrol-C Medicated", Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, and Glaxo Specialties, Inc., a Corporation, Intervenor/defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Ristoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Articles of Drug ...Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. 225 Cartons, More or Less, of an Article or DrugCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Ristoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.