Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Whitehead & Atherton Machine Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1885PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

It appears that the plaintiff, as the party of the first part, and the firm of Whitehead and Atherton, as the party of the second part, executed a written contract in 1877, the *595material part of which was as follows: “ The party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of money hereinafter named to be paid by the party of the second part, doth hereby agree to give his undivided influence in favor of the machinery manufactured by the party of the second part, and the party of the second part doth hereby promise and agree to pay to the party of the first part the sum of five per…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pittsfield & North Adams Railroad v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. New York Central Railroad v. StonemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. Benedict Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. Ryan v. OhmesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. Chicago G. W. Ry. Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API