Blum v. D'Angelo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
None of the vacation work of Plunkett, Tortorelli and Walsh was such that it would or might be subject to city inspection or approval. The determinations of the respondent Commissioner that these petitioners were guilty of a violation of the Code of Ethics are not sustainable on the theory that they did engage in certain vacation time electrical work upon an installation or project which would or might later require approval or inspection by their coemployees or by a city department in which they were working, in which they might be assigned to work or in which they might have influence.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weill v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Brown v. BronsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Al-Co Properties, Inc. v. Department of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Stern, Simms & Stern v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Jesselli v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.