Legal Opinion

Frederick v. Chapman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 16, 1928No. 12404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabeer.

This action was brought “for the purpose of recovering possession of two pieces of real estate in the City of Rock Hill.” One of these is known and designated as the church property; the other, as the parsonage property. For the sake of brevity, we shall refer to the Wesleyan Methodist Convention (or Church) of America, as the connection; and to the North Carolina Conference of the Wesleyan Methodist Connection (or Church) of America, as the conference.

The plaintiffs, in substance, allege that the connection is a religious…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McConnell v. KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
  2. Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v. WindhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Vance v. FergusonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  4. Watts v. WittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  5. Carr v. MouzonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Few v. FewSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. BankDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
  4. Elliott v. Greer Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API