Legal Opinion
Avesta Sheffield, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 18, 1993No. Court No. 93-01-00062PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Restani, Judge:
Plaintiffs Avesta Sheffield, et al. (“Avesta”), move for judgment on the agency record, arguing that the United States Depart*1213ment of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“ITA”) erred in its assessment of antidumping duties. The primary issues presented by this case are 1) whether a pass-through or “tracing” analysis is a condition for the grant of a duty drawback adjustment, 2) whether ITA relied on erroneous cost data, 3) whether ITA erred in relying on duty-inclusive data to determine constructed foreign market value, and 4) whether ITA properly adjusted U.S.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Badger-Powhatan, a Div. of Figgie Intern. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Badger-Powhatan, a Division of Figgie International, Inc. v. United States, and Rubinetterie A. Giacomini, S.P.A., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Far East MacHinery Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Far East MacHinery Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Independent Radionic Workers of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.