Buckley v. Monsarrat
Hawaii Supreme Court
Original.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
WHITING, J.
This case was presented under Sec. 1140 of Civil Laws as amended by Act 18, Session Laws 1898, on a submission of case without action. The facts out of which the controversy arises, as stated in the submission, are as follows:
On the 1st day of June, 1882, M. D. Monsarrat intermarried *266with one Florence E. Luce and she became his wife in accordance with the laws of the Hawaiian Islands. At the date of his marriage with the said Florence E. Luce, the said M. D. Monsarrat was possessed of or owned an estate in fee simple consisting of an undivided one-fifth share…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Moore v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Barrett v. FailingSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Price v. . PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
- Collins v. AkoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
- Hattie Farm v. Farm CornnHawaii Supreme Court · 1930
- Menashe v. SuttonHawaii Supreme Court · 1950
- In re a Submission on Agreed Facts in a Controversy Between Bishop & MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940