Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1917No. Civ. No. 2365PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Albert Lee Stephens, City Attorney, W. D. Spalding, and Wm. P. Mealey, Deputy City Attorneys, for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission allowing compensation to Thomas Meehan, who was a claimant against the city of Los Angeles alleging that he had been injured while in the employ of that municipality. Meehan acted as judge of an election board at a municipal election held in the city of Los Angeles on the sixth day of June, 1916. After the ballots were counted by the board, Meehan, using his own automobile, took the election returns and was proceeding to the city hall, where he proposed tó deliver them to the proper officer. While'so engaged Ms "automobile…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claremont Country Club v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Sibley v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Mono County v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  3. Candelaria v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Jochen v. County of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Jochen v. County of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API