Legal Opinion

Candelaria v. Board of County Commissioners

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1967No. 8149PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment denying them workmen’s compensation. The issue is whether either plaintiff was an employee within the meaning of our Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Mary Louise Candelaria was an election judge. Arthur Candelaria was a messenger, delivering the ballot boxes to the county clerk. Arthur, accompanied by Mary Louise, was transporting the boxes' when he was involved in an automobile accident. The claims for workmen’s compensation are based on injuries received in the accident.

Plaintiffs claim that the Board of County…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Latta v. HarveyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Shaver v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Campbell v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Pollack v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Eaton v. Bernalillo CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jelso v. World Balloon Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Burton v. Crawford and CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Webb v. Village of Ruidoso DownsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Rock v. Commissioner of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Lacy v. SilvaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API