Legal Opinion

Martin v. Street Improvement District No. 324

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 22, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This is an action brought by Melbourne M. Martin against Street Improvement District No. 324 of. the city of Little Rock, and George M. Heard, Mrs. Dixie F. Jackson and J. E. Lord, commissioners thereof. The plaintiff alleged that he entered into a contract with the defendants whereby they agreed to pay plaintiff the sum of $300 for services performed in the promotion and organization of the district; that the contract had been performed on the part of plaintiff and the defendants had refused to pay him for his services under the contract.

Two of the commissioners and certain property owners…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thibault v. McHaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Richardson v. Scott's Bluff CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Gould v. SanfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Hyland v. Oregon Hassam Paving Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Deane v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Water Improvement District 1 of Benton v. BrinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API