Legal Opinion

Medtronic, Inc. And Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Daig Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 30, 1986No. Appeal 85-2645PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISSELL, Circuit Judge.

Daig Corporation (Daig) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 1 which found U.S. Patent No. 3,902,501 (’501) not proved invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and infringed in a patent infringement action instituted by the assignee of the ’501 patent, Medtronic, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. (collectively called Medtronic). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

A. The Invention

A pacemaker is a device comprised of a pulse generator, a lead and a power source which is used to provide electrical stimulation to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. Raytheon Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Roper Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Jose Guadalupe Larita-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Miles Laboratories, Inc. And Triangle Biomedical Equipment, Inc., Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Shandon Inc. And Shandon Southern Products LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Gonzales v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. Hazlehurst v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  5. King Instruments Corporation v. Luciano Perego and Tapematic, Defendant/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API