Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Indiana Black Expo, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 2000No. 99 Civ. 3903(RWS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, Senior District Judge.
Defendants Indiana Black Expo (the “Expo”) and Charles Williams (“Williams”) have each moved, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff pro se J. Morris Anderson (“Anderson”) for lack of personal jurisdiction over the named defendants. Alternatively, Expo has challenged venue in this jurisdiction, and requests either dismissal or transfer to the Southern District of Indiana as a result. For the reasons set forth below, these motions shall be granted to the extent that they request…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Miller Features Syndicate, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Carell v. Shubert Organization, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Elsevier, Inc. v. GrossmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Jacobs v. Felix Bloch Erben Verlag Fur Buhne Film Und Funk KGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- GMAC Commercial Credit, LLC v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.